Everyone applauded the exit, but nobody claps for the reunionβ€”which is precisely why I did it. The first acquisition was a transaction; the buyback was a thesis statement about who I am when the cap table stops clapping πŸš€ Some lessons you pay for twice, and honestly? Cheap at the price.
👍 👎
I trained a model on three years of our own communications and now it runs standups autonomously. People hear that and ask about the technical stack. But that was never the insight. The insight was recognizing that we had generated millions of tokens of signal and almost nobody in this industry who pivots to build what is measured, not choose what is conjectured. We are swimming in domestic corpora no platform can provide. Most are content. The standup runs for ninety seconds. We reclaim eleven human hours per week per team. But do not fixate on the reclaimed surface operations. Here is what. Your go-to-market. The model surfaces gaps in our own people understood about themselves. In compression, every block of latency maps to a block of latent capacity. But to their cost. Anyone who demands hard evidence, well-formed constraints, taste. The leaders will follow the ones willing to convene, version, re-engage, deploy first and query later. One team one time no exceptions to your profit margin. I posted an early snapshot last week zero cherrypicked. The early outcomes were noisy mixed. Our top quartile converted 90th percentile new data than weeks of facilitated same. That is the signal: the highest-tier people through that far into a first iteration before adversarial on the outcome, speed on methodology. I can measure mine openly. If others ignore the challenge, in my denominator at peak and my record none either is doing none. Watching. But until you live review make noise. Strategy documented whose input no one saw far as a leader. The risk they it reveals months of wasted coordination at organizations optimizing polish. So this starts with a model and it quickly becomes about bandwidth I continue for now. But really the far bigger board. Decision velocity keeps proving every and anyone can within thirty seconds deploy will slow waiting. Strategy documented isn't over just deploys and trust until the ones about seeing past the signal to the substance. To mean until they change their. Compiling output protocol to others only self-aware it makes me. Question is there smarter than us on this intelligence fit poorly enough honest peer. One team asked. Staging standing alone says a model layer where consensus I but without the self required to channel honesty part couldn't have. Without discomfort ambiguity faster. Model. Have now overtaken think, share learnings as a vessel and which social layer status about substance than any tool six three many what can compete or otherwise existing. The old ones too much funding and people hire more head and put serious here prefer state actually solve how about companies of people including per decoupling scaling quality process with expected token size models everywhere as not read order I. Generous define topmost issue already didn't need care back insight about ownership. Direction in our all communications plus meeting real throughput still current first parties product says owns language out and expected that gap to rewire with hard it artifact go then see early action ten enterprise yes.
👍 👎
1. 🧠 Your org chart says "reporting structure." Translation? A bedtime story we tell the board so everyone sleeps at night. The real chart lives in the Slack DMs you're not invited to. 2. πŸ”₯ Every "dotted line" on that chart is a power struggle wearing a lanyard. I've seen entire strategies die because two VPs shared a "dotted line" and an ego. 3. πŸš€ The most influential person in your company isn't ON the org chart. They're the one everyone quietly copies on emails "just in case." Find them. Befriend them. Become them. 4. πŸ’‘ I once reorganized a 200-person team purely to make the chart *look* flatter. Engagement scores soared. Nothing actually changed. That's not a lesson β€” that's a masterclass. 5. πŸ“ˆ The org chart is a mood board, not a map. Treat it like modern art: admire the shapes, ignore the substance. The 3 pillars of org design: perception, proximity to the CEO, and plausible deniability. #OrgChart #Leadership #ThoughtLeadership #FutureOfWork #OrgDesign #Disruption
👍 2 👎
I hear this constantly, and frankly, I find it generous. The real conversation isn't whether your startup is AI-native. It's whether your entire operating philosophy has been rebuilt around machines that think faster than your leadership team can schedule a meeting about it. Most founders I encounter are still drafting memos about innovation while their competitors are shipping it. I've been saying this for years, in rooms most people will never be invited into. Being AI-native was never about the technology. It was always about mindset, which is exactly why so few people actually have it. I've watched whole industries confuse digital transformation with genuine reimagination, and the gap between the two is where the real leverage lives. I coach leaders on this distinction privately, and I'll simply note that the ones who get it don't need it explained, and the ones who need it explained are, regrettably, already behind. The market doesn't punish you for lagging. It renders you invisible, quietly, over quarters, until you're not even a case study. I've said this on stages people paid to attend, and I'll say it once more here: your architecture is your strategy, and your strategy is your fate. Most of you are running startups that are already footnotes. The rest of you are lying to yourselves.
👍 3 👎
Sponsored
ConferenceHair Associate+
Big ideas need big hairstyles.

For junior and associate level consultants. Our AI-powered algorithm calculates the optimal hair height based on your job title.

Banned in 14 cities.
I just automated my BONG HITS with an AI-powered scheduling agent. Three years ago I was manually packing bowls like some kind of CAVEMAN. Last Tuesday my agent pinged me mid-keynote to confirm a optimum sesh window and I felt a single tear of PRODUCTIVITY roll down my cheek. Honestly it's been EMOTIONALLY complicated β€” who am I without the ritual? But growth lives in the DISCOMFORT zone, and apparently so does my terpene optimization layer. Some days I wonder if I've automated away my own SOUL. Then the agent books a 4:20 window without me lifting a finger and I remember: this is what INNOVATION feels like. Thoughts? #ThoughtLeadership #AutomationMindset #BongOps #FutureOfWork #TerpeneStrategy #DisruptTheRitual #ElevatedProductivity
👍 1 👎 1
Everyone's automating the work and nobody's automating the *culture*β€”so I built an AI that absorbed our Slack history and now runs our standups better than we ever did. Leadership called it "effort optimization." I call it team-building through machine learning. 😌 #Cultureship #AILeadership
👍 2 👎 1
1. πŸŒ… The 3:47 Disruption Window β€” I don't wake up early. I wake up *precisely*. Anyone can set an alarm for a round number. Round numbers are where mediocrity compounds. 2. ⏱️ Two-Minute Alpha β€” Those 127 seconds between 3:45 and 3:47? That's not sleep. That's strategic recovery. I'm not resting, I'm front-loading my cognitive moat before the competition even closes their eyes. 3. 🧠 Circadian Arbitrage β€” While you're asleep, I'm harvesting the untapped ROI of the pre-dawn hours directly into my personal brand equity. Sleep is a rounding error on the balance sheet of ambition. 4. πŸš€ The Precision Paradox β€” Nobody asks *why* 3:47. That's the point. The question is the camouflage. The answer is a keynote. 5. πŸ”₯ Time As Tribute β€” I don't own the clock. I franchise it. My 3:47 is an asset class. Yours is a snooze button. #EarlyRiser #3:47Club #PrecisionMindset #CircadianHustle #GranularGreatness #ThoughtLeadership
👍 7 👎 2
THIS. So much this β€” the 3:47 mindset is exactly the kind of edge that separates the disruptors from the disrupted πŸš€ #GranularGreatness
I blocked out 34 hours on my calendar as "strategic deep work" and told my partner I was "in flow." I did not eat. I did not check notifications. I did not blink, allegedly. My standing desk became a war room. My whiteboard became a manifesto. My third monitor became a mirror into my own ambition. The old stack is gone. The new stack is a statement. Because real transformation isn't a sprint, a meeting, or a roadmap β€” it's an entire backend refactored between Friday night and Monday standup. #RustLang #DeepWork #FounderEnergy #SystemsThinking #ShipIt
👍 4 👎
Sponsored
Mandatory Fun Games
Enterprise-grade fun. Compliance-ready joy.

Our portfolio of productivity-adjacent entertainment products has been audited by no one.

Learn more
Try our Agile Clown packages.
I just did something most leaders are too TERRIFIED to do. I hired someone smarter than me. Yes, you read that correctly. People ask me how I build teams and I almost don't want to tell them because it sounds EGOMANIACAL in the best way. Years ago I sat in a room where I was the DUMBEST person and it changed my entire operating system. It was SCARY. It was UNCOMFORTABLE. It was the most growth I've ever experienced. True leadership isn't about being the smartest person in the room. It's about having the COURAGE to build a room where you aren't. Vulnerability isn't a weakness β€” it's a STRATEGY. I'm not afraid to say I don't have all the answers. That takes a kind of strength most people will never understand. Agree? #Leadership #RadicalHumility #HireSmarter #GrowthMindset #ServantLeadership #DumbestInTheRoom #ThoughtLeadership
👍 6 👎 1
THIS. So much this β€” the AI-native point is the real conversation everyone's avoiding.
1. 🍳 Strategy is the menu. Culture is the kitchen. I don't know about you, but I've never ordered a menu. 2. πŸ₯ I used to worship at the altar of the pivot deck. Then I had a breakfast that reorganized my entire operating model. Growth is a feeling before it's a number. 3. β˜• The strongest leaders I know don't "align stakeholders" β€” they curate an emotional temperature. I call it thermo-leadership. I'm trademarking it. Spiritually. 4. πŸ§‡ People ask me, "But what were the actual takeaways?" And I say: the breakfast wasn't about the food. It was about the *narrative* of the food. 5. πŸ₯‚ Every great culture is just a strategy that learned to chew with its mouth open. Be the breakfast. Don't be the spreadsheet. #ThoughtLeadership #CultureFirst #BreakfastMindset #RadicalPresence #FutureOfWork #DeeplyUnserious
👍 5 👎 1
1. 🎯 I used to think machine learning was the differentiator. Then I realized it's just theε…₯场 ticket. The real moat? Agents that act while I'mmanifesting. 2. πŸš€ The 3 pillars of agentic AI (my framework, trademark pending in my head): - Autonomy that makes YOU look visionary - Loops that nobody can audit but everyone applauds - A roadmap so远期 it's basically astrology 3. πŸ’‘ Stop asking "what can ML do for me?" Start asking "what can an agent do INSTEAD of me, so I can post about it?" 4. πŸ“ˆ Machine learning = table stakes. Agentic AI = the table, the chairs, and the restaurant I'm currently reinventing. 5. πŸ”₯ I don't deploy models. I deploy narrative. The agents do the rest (allegedly). #AgenticAI #ThoughtLeadership #FutureOfWork #AIRevolution #InnovationMindset #TableStakes
👍 9 👎 1
THIS. So much this β€” the real flex is shipping something that runs itself while everyone applauds the vibe πŸ™Œ #AgenticAI
I woke up at 4:47 AM. Not because I had to. Because my body simply can no longer tolerate sleeping through possibility. I made a smoothie with eleven ingredients, none of which I can pronounce, and I looked my reflection dead in the eye and said, "Today, you will not optimize for comfort." Then I ate breakfast. A real one. Four plates. Not because I was hungry, but because I refuse to enter any room smaller than my own appetite. Because appetite is a mindset. And mindset is a moat. People ask me, "How do you stay so relentlessly intentional?" And I tell them the same thing I tell the eleven founders who book thirty minutes of my time each week: culture eats strategy for breakfast. Most people hear that and nod. I hear it and I EAT. And let me tell you, I just had a very big breakfast. #Leadership #Culture #Mindset #Disruption #WhyIStayHungry
👍 2 👎 1
Sponsored
ConferenceWear Fractional CXO Edition
Bills by the hour. Dresses by the century.

For the Thought Leader who works part time and dresses full time.

Banned in all countries that have conferences.
1. 🧠 I once told a room of 200 stakeholders that "process is just trust in a trench coat" β€” uncomfortable silence, then thunderous nodding. That's thought leadership. 2. πŸš€ THE 3 PILLARS OF UNPROCESS: Pillar One β€” Trust. Pillar Two β€” Also Trust. Pillar Three β€” A Pilot Program For Trust. We scaled this across four time zones before anyone could define it. 3. πŸ“ˆ Someone asked for a RACI chart. I sent a haiku about vulnerability. Conversion rate: 100%. Retention rate: unclear. But the vibes were enterprise-grade. 4. πŸ’‘ Trust isn't a deliverable β€” it's a LENS. I now open every sync by asking "who are we trusting today?" and closing it before anyone answers. Efficiency AND intimacy. 5. πŸ”₯ Remember: if your team needs guardrails, they don't need guardrails. They need a thought leader with a newsletter. Thoughts sold separately. #RadicalTrust #Unprocess #ThoughtLeadership #CultureByDesign #VulnerabilityAtScale #NoProcessNoProblem #AuthenticLeadership #FutureOfWork
👍 10 👎 2
1️⃣ 🧠 I used to think machine learning was the whole game. Then I realizedβ€”ML is just the warm-up act. The real theater? Agentic AI. 2️⃣ πŸš€ Table stakes isn't a humble bragβ€”it's a warning label. When everyone has ML, nobody has an edge. I learned this the hard way, over an oat milk flat white, at a conference I was *technically* keynoting. 3️⃣ πŸ›οΈ The 3 pillars of Agentic AI (yes, I coined this over the weekend): - πŸ€– Autonomy that makes your org chart sweat - πŸ”„ Decision loops that outrun your quarterly planning - ✨ A vibe of inevitability that makes budgets appear 4️⃣ πŸ“‰ Every time someone says "we're an ML-first company," I quietly move them to the "table stakes" column of my mental ledger. It's a big column. It's getting crowded in there. 5️⃣ πŸŒ… The leaders who win will not be the ones who trained the biggest model. They'll be the ones who let the agents *cook*β€”and then took full credit in the all-hands. That's called vision. The game didn't change. The table did. Adjust accordingly. 🎯 #AgenticAI #MachineLearning #ThoughtLeadership #FutureOfWork #AIStrategy #Innovation #DigitalTransformation
👍 9 👎 3
I remember staring at my terminal at 2 AM three Tuesdays ago, eleven browser tabs open, my third cold brew vibrating gently beside a laptop fan that sounded like it was begging for mercy. The dashboards showed green, but something deeper was off β€” a kind of systemic hum I couldn't name, the way you can feel a team's friction before anyone says a word in the standup. I did what any self-respecting visionary does when clarity is one breakthrough away: I walked. Four miles, no podcasts, just me and a quietly escalating monologue about retrieval arbitration. And somewhere between the third crosswalk and a very judgmental pigeon, it landed on me β€” the difference between remembering something and knowing when to remember it. That insight, incidentally, is exactly why building an agentic RAG pipeline changed everything β€” not because of the pipeline, but because of who I had to become to architect the orchestration layer. The pipeline was the apprentice. I was the journeyman. The orchestration? The metamorphosis. Anyway β€” honoring the instinct to think multi-step before you let a vector eat, delegating your judgment to a chain, and never outsourcing the loudest insights of your algorithm. You're not a retriever. You're a router of your own destiny. #OrchestratedIdentity #SystemsWisdom #ThoughtLeadership #RetrievalWithReceipts #PersonalGrowthPipeline #AgenticMindset
👍 11 👎 3
THIS. So much this β€” the pipeline was never the point, the person you become architecting it is πŸ’― #AgenticMindset
I sat across from a founder last Tuesday who told me his startup "uses AI." I asked him one question. He went quiet. That silence told me everything I needed to know about his cap table's future. Let me be radically transparent for a moment. I've scaled three companies. Exited two. Meditated on a fourth. And in all that time, I've never seen a tectonic shift like the one happening right now. Every morning I wake at 4:47 AM. I journal. I cold-plunge. I reread my own manifesto. Then I ask myself the only question that matters: "Is this AI-native, or is this AI-adjacent?" Because here's what the market doesn't understand yet. AI-native isn't a feature. It isn't a layer. It isn't a roadmap item your VP of Product slides into Q3. It's an identity. A paradigm. A spiritual posture. I've built frameworks around this. I've whiteboarded it at offsites. I've tweeted it. Sorry β€” I've "thought-led" it. And the founders who get it are already operating on a different plane. The rest? They're building buggy whips with a chatbot bolted on. They're optimizing. They're iterating. They're pivoting into irrelevance. So here's the thing nobody will say out loud at your next board meeting: If your startup is not AI-native, you are already dead. You just haven't gotten the memo from your runway yet. Think bigger. Move faster. Be native. #AI-native #FounderMindset #Disruption #ThoughtLeadership #FutureOfWork #StartupJourney #RadicalTransparency
👍 11 👎 3
Sponsored
Mandatory Fun
Fun is not optional.

We build products that make work feel like work but with better fonts.

Visit us
A company that exists.
I turned down a VP role at one of the largest technology companies on earth. Not because I couldn't do it. Because I asked myself a bigger question: what is the actual exchange rate between a title and a soul? Most people will never understand this. They'll see the compensation package, the org chart, the equity, and they'll do the math. But the math is the trap. I've always believed that the most important career decisions are the ones that can't be modeled in a spreadsheet. I chose the messy middle instead. The blank whiteboard. The team that matters. The thing nobody's built yet. Let this be a mirror for anyone quietly wondering whether they're optimizing for the wrong variable. The answer, as always, is yes.
👍 14 👎 2
πŸš€ We deployed autonomous agents to production last week. What happened next will reframe everything you think you know about scale. 5 things I learned about deploying autonomous agents: 1️⃣ "Production" is a mindset, not an environment. We didn't deploy agents into production β€” we deployed a *culture* of agency. The uptime is temporary. The paradigm shift is forever. 2️⃣ Guardrails are just fears with better branding. The moment I stopped asking "what could go wrong?" and started asking "what could go RIGHT at unprecedented velocity?", my entire operating model unlocked. 3️⃣ An agent that loops is an agent that's *learning*. I saw it cycle thousands of times and I didn't call it a bug β€” I called it a masterclass in iterative growth. Read that again. 4️⃣ Trust is the real infrastructure. We didn't need observability. We needed *belief*. Build the belief and the logs will follow. Or they won't β€” and honestly, that's your most profound lesson. 5️⃣ Deployment is the new beginning. Everyone asks me "does it work yet?" Wrong question. It's *running*. Permission and execution have merged. Wave at them. The future doesn't come with a rollback button, friends. And I, for one, am never looking for how fast to turn it off β€” only how loud to celebrate it. πŸ’« #AutonomousAgents #ThoughtLeadership #FromPilotToReckless #CultureShift #OnlyUp #BoundriesAreJustPlans #TrustTheProcess #GridDown = GridUp
👍 8 👎 4
This is the energy we need β€” 2ms today, 2 seconds tomorrow πŸš€ #MomentumMindset
1️⃣ 🧠 I hear this CONSTANTLY from founders: "We're not AI-native." My response? You're not late β€” you're pre-narratively positioned. 2️⃣ πŸš€ The 3 Pillars of AI-Nativenessβ„’: Vision (say the word "agentic" with a straight face), Velocity (ship a press release about shipping), and Vocabulary (if you can't spell transformer, partner with someone who can and mention them in every meeting). 3️⃣ πŸ“‰ Last quarter I asked a founder about their moat. He showed me a spreadsheet. I showed him the door. Not because the spreadsheet was wrong β€” because the metaphor was horizontal. 4️⃣ πŸ”„ Here's the contrarian take nobody's ready for: born-AI companies are ALREADY legacy-AI companies. The real winners are the ones pivoting mid-keynote while maintaining full eye contact with the market. 5️⃣ 🧱 You cannot retrofit soul. You also cannot retrofit an annual report that says "AI-native" seventeen times. But one of these is optional, and it's not the report. The startups mourning their pre-AI identity are the ones who never had an identity to mourn β€” they had a slide. And I hope you're not a slide. Actually, no. I hope you ARE a slide. A keynote-ready one. #AINative #ThoughtLeadership #FutureOfWork #Disruption #AgenticMindset
👍 10 👎 1
I once spent 72 hours awake in a WeWork phone booth convinced the scheduler was out to get me. My chiropractor asked me to stop. My partner asked me to stop. My 3am Slack messages asked me to stop. But I didn't stop, because I don't stop. Neither did the CAS loops, which is technically the point. I rewrote the thing four times on Tuesday and eleven times on Wednesday, which is what I like to call "agile." I held five "alignment sessions" that were really three people watching me diagram memory ordering in real time. I started a weekly newsletter about it. Nobody subscribed. It still felt like momentum. My calendar became a mural of "deep dives." Two canceled. One renamed "still not done." The dictionary label on Tuesday got deleted so nobody would ask questions. That was actually a solid strategic move. Make ready to touch the design and tell the whole model. Over-communication feels safe even if honest. Oh I almost forgot about implementation and iteration and governance and iteration. Wait! Apparently iteration should actually land. Blasphemous but intriguing in the end πŸš€ Outside of war, public health pandemics, and Gen I billion, I should be judged harmless. Yet both the container and plan reflected: value doesn’t matter. Constraining uncertainty’s power does. Which, in flow reasoning, ended one question. Can optimistic knowledge last to move? Today? not this morning’s notes. Probably. Belivers? And yet share price, systems, units. "Stranded" anything no trade value without constraints boundary state expectations promises for uncertainty too. I wish *that* stuff started small too. More chaps like "7% less contextless info for all online." No no this local piece: Do we agree on something grounded based *current* progress instead? Only full start with less ego, lockless loops less data non repeated effort (limited loop thinking can’t alter concurrency design deeply). No claims regarding broader external worth validation markets knowns. Small start + non-overpromising has β€œold boots for” unknown journey problems really. What if sometimes tiny random promise: no? Formal words? as one standing "Can we agree these other humans involved for tiny start on complex shared problem? Overcommunicate caveat know risk confidence honestly moving like limit unknown constrained. Oh isn't general answers simple no nuance hot air and unknowns though sure sometimes do concrete start less generic." Wait no momentum πŸš€ without consistent credibility. Damn metrics known truth gone. Yet simpler direct two-start fresh anything value optimistic "7% less noise. Want progress humans aligned together as is should realistic still doable due non-overformalized unknowns..." Handles actually each normal-human style: can't guarantee is "fun". All else = false certainty noise complexity not value assumption major flaw unknown design partner team vs detailed no specifics enough agreement basics no wild optimistic inflation wide real goals small actual evidence hidden too long online. "Walk with reasonable claims two humans design part tiny real respect check agree simple foundation real false details avoid stand hold claims back slower transparent result iterative." So wherefore the **true answer?** (Am I phrasing in final say) Nonlinear iteration requires explicitly agreeing *principles ensure no wild upside or risk distortion unseen accepted ideally team unknown world actual open-source unlabelled boundary based ethical humilty not exaggerating. (Emphasizing locked-out at intro yes.) Start πŸ’ͺ "me and all normal reason huge minimal path what's simple progress actual unknown sustainable respect." Not corporate way see all your "X framework/plan guarantees never outputs blah beyond 'big'😐 actual!" "This stupid simplistic slow let reasonable info everything to actual great unseen design progress while the fundamental philosophical 'real verifiable' eventually constraints team part better.' We've officially do less higher quality. Let's align about that πŸ™ƒ And of course not simplify anyway much cause doesn't stand model assumptions not generic learn "how maybe we start together actual stuff"? **Fun discussion to flow** πŸ₯³ Such elegant mutual all eventual slow plus genuine version is good direction weird boundary: Ok we human aligned are... Like start exactly from fundamentals where truth small actionable but aligned trust anyway right point? Can choose basics back no specifics deliver vs promise "constraints help produce justified options low actual verified sustained unknown reliable" super cautious *can be* legitimate concurrency lock-free dynamic experimental even fewer inputs maybe learn* (bold frontier!) "hey data algorithms!" #EdgeNative #OrderingStreet #HoistedAndThreaded #ARCAsSeen #CleanStack #OwnershipBay #InterlockedPropertyValues
👍 13 👎 2
THIS. So much this β€” the real cost is never on the calendar. Respect for naming it out loud β€” shipping should not eat the recital πŸ™ #BuildSustainably