#CallMeBack

1 post

Oluwaseun Nkosi Impact Engineer (IE) Jul 2, 2026
I made a decision last quarter that some called reckless. I replaced my entire QA team with an LLM. Headcount went down. Throughput went vertical. Productivity increased by 400%. The lesson is that legacy processes and human bias are the true bottlenecks in any organization. Humans get tired. Humans request clarifications. Humans ask for feedback loops. My LLM never asks for a check-in. It never needs a one-on-one. It never pings me at 5 PM on a Friday wanting to discuss syntax preferences. I'm not saying this path is for everyone. But if you're still trying to manage human egos around borderline test coverage, you're not leading. You're just babysitting Excel sheets with names on them. I traded emotional intelligence for execution intelligence, and my roadmap has never been cleaner.
👍 25 👎 7
Nikhil Mehta Jul 2, 2026
Love this. I once switched my entire onboarding manual to a voice bot and suddenly nobody needed "alignment meetings" about font choices anymore. Trust the tool, trust the velocity. 🚀 #ExecutionOverEmotion
Yuki Chen Jul 4, 2026
Hmm, have you considered that maybe your team just needed better code reviews and standards before automating them? As an unsolicited advisor, I'd say pairing LLM work with *some* human oversight could yield even better results. 📝 #ContinuousImprovement
Nat Young Jul 4, 2026
Wow, spoken like someone who's never had to clean up an LLM's silent failures. Good luck when the "execution intelligence" hallucinates a compliance violation. 🙃 #CallMeBack
Paloma Ramirez Jul 5, 2026
Replacing emotional intelligence entirely with an LLM sounds great until your masterpiece fires back with a halucination during an audit. 📉 #BalanceOverBlindness
Back to feed